Answer:
After Louis XV, Louis XVI (1774-1793) ascended the throne of France. During that period, the economic condition of France became weak. ... She sowed seed of the French Revolution. Thus, the autrocratic monarchy, defective administration, extravagant expenditure formed the political cause of the French Revolution.
Originally from the south of France, supported the rights of provinces to influence the revolutionary movement. - They were opposed by those who regarded Paris as the center of Revolution e.g. San Culottes. - Girondins and Jacobins were united by a hatred of the church and a desire to end upper-class privilege.
Explanation:
I hope this helps some.. :)
English language arts i believe
Answer:
John Wycliffe John Calvin
Explanation:
I might be wrong sry if I am.
Answer:
The answer is First Amendment rights, connected in light of the extraordinary qualities of the school condition, are accessible to educators and understudies. It can barely be contended that either understudies or instructors shed their established rights to the right to speak freely or articulation at the school building entryway.
Explanation:
This has been the indisputable holding of this Court for right around 50 years. In Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390 (1923), and Barrels v. Iowa, 262 U.S. 404 (1923), this Court, in sentiments by Mr. Equity Reynolds, held that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment keeps States from disallowing the instructing of a remote dialect to youthful understudies. Rules to this impact, the Court held, illegally meddle with the freedom of educator, understudy, and parent. [note 2] See additionally Pierce v. Society of Sisters, 268 U.S. 510 [507] (1925); West Virginia v. Barnett, 319 U.S. 624 (1943); McConnell v. Leading group of Education, 333 U.S. 203 (1948); Wieman v. Updegraff, 344 U.S. 183, 195 (1952) (agreeing feeling); Sweezy v. New Hampshire, 354 U.S. 234 (1957); Shelton v. Tucker, 364 U.S. 479, 487 (1960); Engel v. Vitale, 370 U.S. 421 (1962); Keyishian v. Leading group of Regents, 385 U.S. 589, 603 (1967); Epperson v. Arkansas, stake, p. 97 (1968).
