1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
larisa [96]
3 years ago
5

WILLGIVE BRAINYLIST Which is the correct way to combine the sentences to form one sentence with a compound subject? My father pl

ayed football in college. My grandfather played football in college. A. My father and my grandfather played football in college. B. My father played football in college, and my grandfather played football in college. C. My father played football in college and my grandfather, too.
English
1 answer:
saveliy_v [14]3 years ago
6 0
The answer is A. My father and my grandfather played football in college. 
You might be interested in
Which prisoners, specifically, were imprisoned in this quarantined section? What does quarantined mean?
Lera25 [3.4K]

Answer:

Self-quarantine requires that a contact remain in a specific room separate from other non-exposed people and pets in the home, and ideally with access to a separate bathroom.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Solve pls brainliest
Goryan [66]
The SIMPLE predicate is returned.

Hope that helps!
3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Should religious belief influence law,five paragraph argument.
konstantin123 [22]

Explanation:

Whatever we make of the substance of Judge Andrew Rutherford's ruling in the Cornish private hotel case, his citation of a striking and controversial opinion by Lord Justice Laws – delivered in another religious freedom case in 2010 – is worth pausing over. The owners of the Chymorvah hotel were found to have discriminated against a gay couple by refusing them a double-bedded room. They had appealed to their right to manifest their religious belief by running their hotel according to Christian moral standards. Given the drift of recent legal judgments in cases where equality rights are thought to clash with religious freedom rights, it is no surprise that the gay couple won their case.

But quite apart from the merits of the case, judges should be warned off any future reliance on the ill-considered opinions about law and religion ventured last year by Lord Justice Laws. Laws rightly asserted that no law can justify itself purely on the basis of the authority of any religion or belief system: "The precepts of any one religion – any belief system – cannot, by force of their religious origins, sound any louder in the general law than the precepts of any other."

A sound basis for this view is Locke's terse principle, in his Letter on Toleration, that "neither the right nor the art of ruling does necessarily carry with it the certain knowledge of other things; and least of all the true religion".

But Laws seemed to ground the principle instead on two problematic and potentially discriminatory claims. One is that the state can only justify a law on the grounds that it can be seen rationally and objectively to advance the general good (I paraphrase). The question is, seen by whom? What counts as rational, objective and publicly beneficial is not at all self-evident but deeply contested, determined in the cut and thrust of democratic debate and certainly not by the subjective views of individual judges. Religiously inspired political views – such as those driving the US civil rights movement of the 1960s or the Burmese Buddhists today – have as much right to enter that contest as any others. In this sense law can quite legitimately be influenced by religion.

Laws' other claim is that religious belief is, for all except the holder, "incommunicable by any kind of proof or evidence", and that the truth of it "lies only in the heart of the believer". But many non-Christians, for example, recognise that at least some of the claims of Christianity – historical ones, no doubt, or claims about universal moral values – are capable of successful communication to and critical assessment by others. Laws' assertion is also inconsistent with his own Anglican tradition, in which authority has never been seen as based on the subjective opinions of the individual but rather on the claims of "scripture, tradition and reason" acting in concert.

6 0
3 years ago
I need something really good to tell my mom that I want to go back too school. I need something that she will say yes please hel
erma4kov [3.2K]

Answer:

Hi, Mom. Can I please go back to school? If I went back to school there would be a better chance of me paying attention, because while I'm at home, there is a lot of distractions. Good luck!

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
Which synonym best replaces the
tiny-mole [99]

Answer:

(a.) Adjust

Explanation:

They are modifying (adjusting) their diet.

They are adjusting from sugary food, to food with more protein.

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • PLZ HELP why is backstory important in a myth?
    9·2 answers
  • A conclusion in narratives can include all EXCEPT...
    5·1 answer
  • Please help and thank you
    7·2 answers
  • An effective safety and security program fosters a broad sense of responsibility and awareness among faculty, staff, and student
    7·2 answers
  • What are the central ideas in Anne Bradstreet’s “As Weary Pilgrim, Now at Rest”?
    15·2 answers
  • Eduardo thinks of a number between 1 and 20 that has exactly 5 factors.What number is he thinking of?
    13·2 answers
  • To which of the senses does the author appeal in describing Old Lady Chong's age?
    10·2 answers
  • What makes Abby Sunderland not a typical teenage girl​
    13·1 answer
  • You need to provide a design brief that summarizes your research that you have done on the given design challenge, explains the
    15·1 answer
  • Rewrite Organizer
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!