Napoleon Bonaparte had a contradictory character. He had an unusual personality. The writer Germaine de Staël described him as being ‘neither good nor violent, neither gentle nor cruel’, which denotes that he was <em>neutral</em>, a<em> calm </em>and <em>calculated/prudent </em>person. he was considered<em> unique </em>and <em>very special </em>for the actions he took and the thinking he put into taking decisions. By the French writer Stendhal, he was seen as <em>very </em><span><em>ambitious</em> (''endowed with amazing abilities and a dangerous ambition’'). He was very <em>firm</em> when it was about facing his <span>opponents. Even more, he could get even mad when his passions had to face disputes. He was a very difficult person, but that made him more <em>powerful </em>than the others. Also, it is said that ''his diversity (<em>diverse</em>) made him <em>fascinating''</em>. He was hostile to his older brother. He had a military, legislative and <span>diplomatic talent. |He was<em> popular</em>, but his more of defects were: picky (<span>squeamish), selfish, egocentric.</span></span></span></span>
Answer:
Nehru support Hindu.
Quaid - e - Azam‘s 14 points was rejected.
Explanation:
Quaid-e-Azam rejected the Nehru Report in which Muslims were not considered for equal representation in administration of India. Nehru is a politician of Indian congress party which works for the purpose of Hindu and wanted rule of Hindus on the whole India. Quaid-e-Azam‘s 14 points were a complete package for Indians, giving religious and political rights to Hindus, Muslims and all minorities but was rejected by the Indian congress party because they wanted the rule of Hindu all over India.
As president of the united States of America, Andrew jackson invited chang, increased pride and introduced democracy as he lead the country.
Answer:2.the use of gunpowder to annihilate Hindu forces
Explanation:I read an book on it in my class
Answer:
Explanation: yes they can btw i answered the empire state building exercise go check it out
