There is no following...
but appeals follow as pathos logos and ethos
Yes, the reason they financed exploration is that they have either a monopoly over the found trade routes or the explorers found valuable resources in the regions.
The main cause of the French and Indian War is the superpower competition between Britain and France. ... The French and Indian War was fought between the two greatest powers on earth. The British and French had been rivals for a very long time in Europe. By 1754, the rivalry had followed them to North America.
Southern Secession is the event or issue that historians can gain.
Answer:
The French traded furs for iron tools, kettles, wool blankets, and other supplies, while Native Americans exchanged furs for items from all over the world.
Explanation:
Before Europeans arrived in the mid-1600s, Native Americans traded throughout the rivers of present-day Minnesota and across the Great Lakes. Following that, European American traders traded manufactured products for precious furs with Native Americans for approximately 200 years.
Fur-bearing animals were mostly trapped by the Dakota and Ojibwe in the Northwest Territory. In the region's forests and streams, they obtained a variety of furs, the most important of which was beaver. Traders from France, the United Kingdom, and the United States offered blankets, rifles and ammunition, fabric, metal tools, and brass kettles in return for the furs.
(Hope this helps can I pls have brainlist (crown)☺️)
