Answer:
hi
Explanation:
1. They arouse readers immediate interest.
2. They increase readers understanding by simplifying concepts
3. They are highly persuasive.
It is important to know your medicine so that if something bad happens to you or someone else you would be able to treat them with the right medication
So, what is the question being asked here? Is it for us to actually write a letter. Or is it for us to answer?
Answer:
It was a breakthrough in his research.
Explanation:
James Giblin's book "The Riddle of the Rosetta Stone" presents the perfect illustrations and descriptions of how ancient hieroglyphs were an important factor. Moreover, the book also presents an interesting overview of ancient Egyptian history for avid historians and even for children interested in archeology.
Based on the given statement, we can know that the <em>"copy of an inscription"</em> that was sent to him by a colleague became the breakthrough in his research. This piece of information helped Jean-Francois Champollion's research and became the breakthrough act that uncovered or revealed everything that's been hidden.
Thus, the correct answer is the first option.
<span>semantic fallacy
</span>
A “slam dunk” argument is likely the product of a fallacious syllogism. The word “slam dunk” has actually originated from the basketball games. This word is used to show people a forceful move in the game of basketball. The player puts the ball in the basket with full power and force. It is often considered a dramatic shot in the game. In literary sense, the word can be used to express violent actions as well. It can also be used to describe a vicious fight among individuals. <span> </span>