1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
telo118 [61]
2 years ago
12

How has literature affected history?

History
1 answer:
Vesnalui [34]2 years ago
7 0
Sorry I’m doing this I need points hope u get the answer soon xx
You might be interested in
Which was one of the effects of European colonization on Native Americans?
Paladinen [302]

Answer:

Near extinction of their population

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What American foreign policy decision reflected this statement?
lidiya [134]

Answer:

The 1951 U.S.-Philippines Mutual Defense Treaty

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Why would church officials want inquisitors to follow strict guidelines?
WITCHER [35]

Answer:

so that they don't kill random people

Explanation:

the church courts were mostly good history just makes them look bad cause they hate Catholics

8 0
2 years ago
Using your economic knowledge and your research, compose a 350- to 450-word editorial that evaluates the effectiveness of these
NemiM [27]

Answer:

The benefits of trade agreements are not felt evenly by all industries in an economy. In fact, even member nations gain varying advantages by entering into trade agreements. However, despite these drawbacks, the United States continues to act on its commitment to free trade. In 2005, the United States signed a fair trade agreement (FTA) with Australia, and in 2012, it signed a trade protection agreement (TPA) with Colombia. Both agreements have been in force for a while. Now the question is, Have these agreements benefited the US economy? Let’s examine the impact of the bilateral agreements with Colombia and Australia on the US economy.

According to the USTR, the International Trade Commission (ITC) predicted that the United States–Colombia TPA would increase national GDP by $2.5 billion (Office of the US Trade Representative). Under the TPA, US exports to Colombia increased from $12.0 billion in 2010 to $18.3 billion in 2013 (US Department of State). The TPA seems to have delivered on its promise, because according to the USTR, US exports to Colombia increased by 30% in 2013 (Office of the US Trade Representative). So financially, Colombia is a lucrative market for the United States. However, the main opposition to the TPA stemmed from concerns about the terrible labor conditions in Colombia and the violent threats to those seeking to improve labor conditions in a country rife with crime. Although violence is a major concern, the FTA will eventually help both nations by bringing about social and labor reforms through economic activity. By helping Colombia become a peaceful country, the United States can pave the way for increased trade with Colombia in the future.

The United States–Australia FTA received considered opposition in both countries. US dairy farmers, ranchers, and small farmers were anxious about job losses resulting from the free entry of Australian products into the US market. However, if we judge by the boost in exports, the FTA has contributed to overall US economic growth. According to the USTR, in the first five years of the FTA, US exports to Australia increased by 33% (Office of the US Trade Representative). The FTA removed all tariffs on American imports into Australia, giving US exporters barrier-free entry into Australian markets.

The export industry plays a key role in driving economic growth and generating jobs in the United States. Colombia and Australia are two large and important markets for US exporters. The United States faces competition from other nations for access to these markets. By signing trade agreements, American goods can compete effectively in these markets. Although the agreements with Colombia and Australia are opposed for valid reasons, the agreements will benefit the US economy over time

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
In what way did the railroad impact the livestock industry?
Tasya [4]

Answer:

Explanation: Answers: 3 on a question: In what way did the railroad impact the livestock industry? The railroad expanded the land holdings of ranchers. The railroad created a job market apart from ranching. a The railroad allowed meat to be transported. d The railroad encouraged westward expansion. n what way did the railroad impact the livestock industry? The railroad allowed meat to be transported. The railroad created a job market apart from ranching. ОО The railroad expanded the land holdings of ranchers, The railroad encouraged westward expansion. hope this is hopeful

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Can someone plllllllllease help me to fiind topic on US History
    15·2 answers
  • What happened to the fish stocks in Europe?
    6·1 answer
  • What ideas and discoveries emerged during the Hellenistic Era
    13·1 answer
  • Choose all that apply. What are three characteristics of the Agricultural Revolution?
    11·2 answers
  • What group was responsible for paying taxes in France
    9·1 answer
  • 10:Pretest 10: Financial Markets
    11·1 answer
  • Who followed the teachings of Karl Marx, led the Bolsheviks, and became the first leader of the USSR? Question 12 options:
    11·2 answers
  • Please help me ASAP!!<br> have a good day
    11·2 answers
  • Which issue was the ROOT of the problem that caused the Civil War?
    11·1 answer
  • According to Turner, in what crucial respect did western states differ from those on the Atlantic coast?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!