Answer:
C. No faith is strong. Only strong have biceps. No faith has biceps.
Explanation:
The question above is related to the topic of "Syllogism." This is a type of reasoning which consists of a <em>premise or</em><em> </em><em>premises</em> and a <em>conclusion.</em> The conclusion is logically derived from the premises. In order to do this, the two premises have to be joined together.
Among the choices above, letter B<em> shows a conclusion that has been logically derived from the first two premises.</em> Its premises support the conclusion.
<em>"No faith has biceps."</em> is a valid argument because it is supported by a premise <em>("No faith is strong.")</em> and another premise <em>("Only strong have biceps.")</em>.
"Only strong have biceps" also means that "All biceps are strong."
American writing of the mid-twentieth century vary from American writing of the nineteenth century covers an expansive scope of subjects from various givers.
I hope the answer will help you, feel free to ask more questions in brainly.
Answer:
In my opinion, the debate that was more powerful and stronger was Nixons. He gave valid and strong sentences.
Explanation:
Answer:
Two days later, Leo doesn’t see Stargirl at school until after lunch. But after lunch, he hears a laughing voice asking, “What do you have to do to get somebody’s attention around here?” When he looks, he sees a girl in jeans, sandals, makeup, and hoop earrings. When Leo incredulously asks, “Stargirl?”
Explanation:
It is because of how she looks.
Answer deleted since it is related to another question. Please disregard..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
