Hello there.
<span>Which of the following statements is true of interjections?
That sentence would be
</span><span>An interjection explains how an action takes place.
</span>
<h3><u>Spier’s five ethical “signposts” theory:</u></h3>
1.According to the Spier’s five ethical “signposts” theory, the bakery clerk should be loyal and trustworthy. So he shouldn’t hide anything from the public and should be loyal .
2.We should be just and treat equally to all people. So he shouldn’t think only about the baker but also he should think of all the people whom the baker is cheating with.
3. We should always help other people. So the baker should also help the people from being cheated by ignoring his personal affairs.
4. We should respect autonomy. The bakery clerk can act as free agent and should only think about his genuine thoughts and opinion.
5. We shouldn’t harm to anybody. The baker clerk without physically harming the baker can ask him to stop doing adulteration.
The answer should be The fight between Beowulf and Grendel when Grendel loses his arm
The statement that best explains the purpose of the Author of "A Complication or Two" is that "He wants to share something he has learned about life and concludes the narrative with a life lesson." (Option B).
<h3>
What is the background to the story?</h3>
The author the story takes a narrative stance in the first person. He narrates how he was able to navigate milestones in life especially those relating to education and the consequences thereof.
For example, it was while doing his residency at Tri-Valley Hospital that he met his wife.
He narrates that his life would have been altered significantly because he would have been unable to meet his wife if he had accepted the admission letter from the same school that his parents went to - hence the role of fate.
Learn more about purpose at:
brainly.com/question/15632673
#SPJ1
The Thoreau feel that the people who serve the state have the same worth as dogs or horses and that they should receive no more respect then a man of straw or a lump of dirt, so these people feel that working for the state rarely make any moral distinctions,and it also says in the paragraph that they are likely to serve the devil. So by this article we can clearly see that they are apposed to any form of serving the state.
I hope this helped :)