Answer:
The answers are:
<h3>Old German tales once held </h3><h3>communities together</h3>
<h3>Older storied often expressed the</h3><h3>essence of Volk culture</h3>
<h3>Epics and other tales were linguistic</h3>
The scientist looked down at the artifact in his hand, a smug look starting to appear on his face. For all of his life he had felt deprived from what was rightfully his, and now he could do exactly what was needed. But first his fathers staff needed some modifications. He didn't care if he was described as a "<span>Avarice", he didn't care much about anything anymore. </span>As he worked his fathers best friend, James, waltzed in.
"And whats all this Ruckus?" he belted his hands crossed across his chest.
"Um...." the scientist started trying to think of a logical explanation, "That information can not be divulged at this time..."
** its more like a story XP **
Answer:
PERSONIFICATION: Line 2: “lilting house”, lilting is an old school style of Gaelic singing, hence the house is personified.
Line 4 and 5: “Time” is personified as the speaker’s playmate.
Line 12: the sun has been personified and is defined as young.
Line 13: “time” is once again treated as the speaker’s friend.
Line 29: the farm is personified by the word “shoulder”.
ASSONANCE: Line 7: “trees” and “leaves” are vowel rhymes. They don’t rhyme perfectly, but the long “e” binds them together.
Line 8: “daisies” and “barley” are again vowel rhymes.
CONSONANCE: Line 9: “rivers” and “windfall” are consonant rhymes, where the “v” of rivers and “f” of windfall binds them together.
IMAGERY: Line 15: the speaker calls himself “green and golden” as a “huntsman and herdsman”.
ALLITERATION: Line 14: “mercy of his means”.
ANAPHORA: Line 21-23: the “and” is the word that these three lines begins with, this builds up the momentum of the poem.
SIMILE: Line 28: the farm is described as “a wanderer white/ with the dew”.
ALLUSION: Line 30: the call of Adam and Eve is a major allusion.
It would be part of the plot
The reading passage and the lecture have conflicting opinions about whether or not implementing high taxes on cigarettes, would have a social advantage. The article strongly postulates that raising the taxes on cigarettes would have more than one benefit for smokers. On the other hand, the listening adamantly opposed that forcing high taxes on cigarettes would benefit smokers, and she believes it has more drawbacks. Its fine hope it is helpful and plz mark brainliest.