Answer: I didn’t finish reading The Diary of Anne Frank, so I’m not too sure about my answer, but I got this.
She noticed that both she and the Jews were stuck in small areas. Most of the Jews were already captured, and she was not. She feels grateful that she was not captured, but she sometimes feels upset that she has to be in hiding instead of going about her day as usual.
Explanation:
Answer:
They reject its crumbs and flap past it.
Explanation:
This poem tells us that game changes frequently by referring to it as a five food upon a shifting plate.
The crowd here are used figuratively, they are people who see the crumbs of fame but are not interested. They see fame for what it is. It leads to destruction, people who eat its crumbs die.
So with this in mind, the poem says the crowd inspect the crowd of fame but don't eat of it. They flap past it to the farmers corn.
Answer:
Classical decomposition requires the study of the space the art takes place in, the color composition if applicable, the lines and flow of the work, the technique used, and the emotion and intellectual response it evokes. The space in which the art takes place could be the phsyical setting, the division of space in the work itself (common in paintings) and how it interacts with the space (negative vs. positive space.) The color composition is important in how the colors chosen relate to the work (or the lack there of). The lines and flow of the work tend to pertain more to visual works but anyone that has evaluated the artwork in automotive design know full well the importance of lines in the work. The technique is important especially in phsyical artwork such as sculpture and relief painting. This is also crucial in multimedia work and abstract sculpture. The last part, largely subjective, is what the work solicits from the viewer. Art without emotion could be argued ... isn't art. Andy Worhol explored this idea with pop art (cambell soup can anyone?) on what is the nature of art. Art is either everywhere (in your spoon, fork, stapler, etc.) or some rare thing (a painting by Raphel verus the macroni happy face the 4 year old did) and if it is a rare thing then what does the art have to convey? What elevates art from engineering then? This last part is solely the responsibility of the critic rather then the artist. An artist always sees their art as art, but what prompts the view to consider it art and what steps does the work take to make a believer out of the viewer.
Explanation:
did it help ?
