Answer:
"Justice decree may not change the heart, but they can restrain the heartless" these words by Martin Luther King Jr. reflects the conditions prevalent at the time in the United States. These words were used to signify the relevance of the Judicial decision in the fight for civil rights. He accepted that these decrees would not install morality. But the scope of regulating the behavior would be widened. He stressed the role of legislative orders and judicial decrees to support African Americans against the prejudice and violence, they were facing.
Some countries often have issues due to a lot of factors. The problem made China reluctant to improve relations with the United States is American support for Taiwan.
<h3>The relationship between China and the United States </h3>
- The relationship between the China and the United States has been very difficult since 1949. due to China policy, the U.S. does not support de jure Taiwan independence.
But the United State did does support Taiwan's membership in the international organizations, such as the World Trade Organization, Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) forum, etc.
In 2018, when the relations between the U. S. and Taiwan was official. This has made China was slow to improve relations with the United States, as China does not see Taiwan independent.
Learn more about American support for Taiwan from
brainly.com/question/1370427
Answer: He was the founder of Judaism.
Explanation:
Answer:
the women
Explanation:
The Iroquois societies were unique among the North American civilizations in that the role of the women was much different. The women were held on high regard. They were well respected in the society. The Clan Mothers were the ones that had the power to appoint leader, as well as to strip the leader off its power. The women had their own possessions, and even after marriage they were keeping them, not being mixed with those of their husbands. The largest land owners were women. In general the Iroquois societies were matriarchal.
Answer: “Birth of a Nation”—D. W. Griffith’s disgustingly racist yet titanically original 1915 feature—back to the fore. The movie, set mainly in a South Carolina town before and after the Civil War, depicts slavery in a halcyon light, presents blacks as good for little but subservient labor, and shows them, during Reconstruction, to have been goaded by the Radical Republicans into asserting an abusive dominion over Southern whites. It depicts freedmen as interested, above all, in intermarriage, indulging in legally sanctioned excess and vengeful violence mainly to coerce white women into sexual relations. It shows Southern whites forming the Ku Klux Klan to defend themselves against such abominations and to spur the “Aryan” cause overall. The movie asserts that the white-sheet-clad death squad served justice summarily and that, by denying blacks the right to vote and keeping them generally apart and subordinate, it restored order and civilization to the South.
“Birth of a Nation,” which runs more than three hours, was sold as a sensation and became one; it was shown at gala screenings, with expensive tickets. It was also the subject of protest by civil-rights organizations and critiques by clergymen and editorialists, and for good reason: “Birth of a Nation” proved horrifically effective at sparking violence against blacks in many cities. Given these circumstances, it’s hard to understand why Griffith’s film merits anything but a place in the dustbin of history, as an abomination worthy solely of autopsy in the study of social and aesthetic pathology.
