Answer:
1. I was eating donuts when you called.
2. Lauren played the violin for several years.
3. Why were you just arriving to work at noon?
4. Did she cry when you told her?
5. Alex worked very hard last week.
6. Patricia was playing golf while her husband cooked dinner.
7. I was answering emails at 9:00 this morning.
8. Did you write emails all morning?
9. What did John work on yesterday?
10. John worked on the car yesterday.
Explanation:
hope this helps! ♥️
Answer:
true
Explanation:
br regsydhfhfucjfychxjchchvhv
Literature and the Holocaust have a complicated relationship. This isn't to say, of course, that the pairing isn't a fruitful one—the Holocaust has influenced, if not defined, nearly every Jewish writer since, from Saul Bellow to Jonathan Safran Foer, and many non-Jews besides, like W.G. Sebald and Jorge Semprun. Still, literature qua art—innately concerned with representation and appropriation—seemingly stands opposed to the immutability of the Holocaust and our oversized obligations to its memory. Good literature makes artistic demands, flexes and contorts narratives, resists limpid morality, compromises reality's details. Regarding the Holocaust, this seems unconscionable, even blasphemous. The horrors of Auschwitz and Buchenwald need no artistic amplification.
I believe B travel is simple compare to space and shuttles
