If your options are these:
<span>A) It is very difficult to fully enjoy nature by oneself.
B ) To experience nature to its fullest requires mental effort.
C) No human being can fully and truly experience nature.
D)The enjoyment of nature is something that takes practice.
It might be said that the best option is B </span>To experience nature to its fullest requires mental effort because Emerson believed that the power in nature is due to nature and to human´s intelligence. What is more, Nature could help "individuals to be more content within society".
Answer: The theme of the poem "Sympathy" is racism, and the imprisoning effect it has on the soul.
Explanation:
Answer:
The answer is: <em>Overall, Schwartz's claim that recycled water faces a public image challenge is well argued and supported with strong evidence.</em>
Explanation:
When making an effective concluding statement, it is very important to wrap things up. It means you need to summarize the points you've mentioned in your essay or article. You can also use words such as: <em>Thus, Therefore, Overall, Finally, Lastly, In general, As a result, As expressed, In conclusion, For this reason, etc. </em><em>The statement above uses "overall," thus it is the answer.</em>
Remember that you shouldn't start opening a new idea here because it marks the end of your essay. You just have to put everything together and it would also be better if you call for an action or a solution if the topic talks about an issue.
<span>A.) The subject was dropped,
but it was clear that it would be brought up again.</span>
<span>
</span>
The first sentence is the most exact and the most precise
because of how the idea is communicated in least amount of words possible. It is important to keep in mind that when you
are writing something that comprehension always goes down the more words there
are in a sentence. Thus, it is always
best to communicate with the fewest words possible. Let’s take a look at another example. Say you are at a baseball game and a fly ball
is coming directly toward you without your knowledge, and the person sitting
next to you tries to warn you by saying the following: “Because of the velocity of a baseball coming
in your direction and the potential damage it may cause if it comes into
contact with your head because you are not wearing a helmet and because
ambulance rides as well as emergency room visits are not fun nor cheap, you
should probably seek to get out of the way as soon as possible.” How would that work? Now, compare that to the more exact/precise
sentence of “Duck!” See how that
works?
Answer:
C. No faith is strong. Only strong have biceps. No faith has biceps.
Explanation:
The question above is related to the topic of "Syllogism." This is a type of reasoning which consists of a <em>premise or</em><em> </em><em>premises</em> and a <em>conclusion.</em> The conclusion is logically derived from the premises. In order to do this, the two premises have to be joined together.
Among the choices above, letter B<em> shows a conclusion that has been logically derived from the first two premises.</em> Its premises support the conclusion.
<em>"No faith has biceps."</em> is a valid argument because it is supported by a premise <em>("No faith is strong.")</em> and another premise <em>("Only strong have biceps.")</em>.
"Only strong have biceps" also means that "All biceps are strong."
