Did imperialism improve the lives of those who were colonized?

1 answer:

7 0

It depends, so yes and no at the same time

Negatives: Imperialism led the world into the business of slave trading which then led to social discrimination around the world. Damaging the cultures and the built-up disunity among the natives ( the people who were colonized ). Imperialism also had stripped multiple countries off their natural resources and left nothing for those who were colonized.

Positives: With imperialism, the technology was improved by a ton. There were new crops to be found, new tools and easier farming methods for people. This all increased food production in the days which these changes meant a lesser amount of death to smaller colonies and nations. ( Overall improving the state of living to say ) Living longer lives and having a better sanitation compared to without or the early days of imperialism

You might be interested in

On which event or issue can historians gain insight from this except

QveST [7]

Southern Secession is the event or issue that historians can gain.

7 0

2 years ago

Which statement explains a planned economy?

stellarik [79]

The first one is correct. In a planned economy, also known as a command economy, the state determines prices and allocates resources.

6 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Janice didn't think that being asked to re-type an essay about the Civil War was related to the job she was applying for as an a

irina1246 [14]

Options: Face validity

Content validity

Construct validity

Predictive validity.

Answer:Face validity

Explanation: Face validity is a term used in research to mean the extent or degree to which a measurement system was able to measure what it was intended to measure.

Face validity is also known as REPRESENTATION VALIDITY AND LOGICAL VALIDITY AND IT IS KNOWN TO SAVE A LOT OF TIME AND STRESS AS IT IS SEEN AS THE "COMMON SENSE" APPROACH TO DETERMINING THE VALIDITY OF A CONCLUSION.

3 0

3 years ago

Pls help!!!! will give brainly!!!<br> why is respect for public opinion important

Ahat [919]

Answer:

It is important because if you don't have respect for public, people could do things....

Explanation:

7 0

2 years ago

Which person was an italian writer who believed that because people were greedy and self-centered, keeping power by any means wa

blsea [12.9K]

Niccolo Machiavelli

Machiavelli was a diplomat in Florence who tried to answer how could a ruler guarantee that he would stay in power by writing The Prince in 1513. Machiavelli claimed that people were greedy and self-centered. He argued that rulers should not be good, and that rulers should do whatever is necessary to keep power and protect their city, including killing and lying. Today, when someone is called a Machiavellian, it means that they are acting tricky and not thinking about the good.

5 0

3 years ago