According to social judgment theory, <u>the judgmental anchor</u> is the person's actual or preferred position.
A framework for studying human judgement is called social judgement theory. It is a meta-theory that guides study on cognitive perspective, or how one interprets the world. A contrast effect is likely to occur when a stimulus is further from one's judging anchor, while an assimilation effect may occur when the stimulus is close to the anchor, according to the underlying psychophysical principle.
The social judgement theory represents an effort to apply the findings and psychophysical principles of judgement to social judgement. SJT is a theory that primarily concentrates on a person's internal processes of their own judgement in relation to the relation inside a communicated message, using the person's chosen viewpoint as the judgmental anchor. The idea was to describe the conditions under which persuasive communications had the best chance of working.
To learn more about social judgment theory here,
brainly.com/question/15118669
#SPJ4
The statement that best paraphrases this text is: The government has already placed as many additional resources as possible at the border.
A paraphrase is a summary of the original text. A summary should mirror the thoughts of the writer.
In the first sentence of this excerpt, the President said that progress has been made on the border and additional resources will be supplied to ensure that the border is monitored.
So, we can summarize the text by saying that the government has already placed as many additional resources as possible at the border.
This is the text:
First, we’ll build on our progress at the border with additional resources for our law enforcement personnel so that they can stem the flow of illegal crossings, and speed the return of those who do cross over. –Address to the nation on immigration, President Obama, 2014
Learn more about summary here:
brainly.com/question/24435726
Answer:
In haste decisions are poor
Explanation:
The Constitution does not set any qualifications for service as a Justice, thus the President may nominate any individual to serve on the Court. Senate cloture rules historically required a two-thirds affirmative vote to advance nominations to a vote; this was changed to a three-fifths supermajority in 1975.
