The speeches that Brutus and Mark Antony deliver differ in several ways. However, one of the most important differences they exhibit is the way in which each speaker addresses the audience.
In the case of Brutus, he decides to appeal to his audience's minds. He speaks in a somewhat impersonal way that suggests that he does not understand the audience deeply. Moreover, his description of the motives of the plot is dry, and it underestimates the connection that the audience felt to Julius Caesar.
On the other hand, Mark Antony seems to understand the crowd better. He uses emotional words that create a more personal relationship. He also focuses on the importance that Julius Caesar had for the audience. This creates a more successful and dramatic speech.
Attributive. When you’re describing someone, you call their characteristics attributes so the same applies here when you’re using adjectives to describe the quality of a noun.
“Every one suspects himself of at least one of the cardinal virtues and this is mine: I am one of the few honest people that I have ever known.”
"It was one of those rare smiles with a quality of eternal reassurance in it”
Sorry that’s what I took off of my project from last year
