Answer:
B
Explanation:
In the Ancient Egyptian Social Pyramid, government officials, priests and nobles would be right below a Pharaoh. Nevertheless, literally everyone was under the Pharaoh with peasants being those at the bottom. (slaves, farmers, servants)
<span>maybe they need some place to deliver mail</span>
The Election Commission is responsible for the conduct of elections to parliament and state legislatures and to the offices of the President and Vice-President. (I hope this is the answer you are looking for, I got it fro ACI.gov)
<u>ANSWER:
</u>
According to the constitution, a former Secretary of State who was born in Yugoslavia but is now a naturalized citizen could not be president of US.
Option (c)
<u>EXPLANATION:
</u>
There are three criteria that must be satisfied to be eligible for becoming the 'President of the United States'. They are:
- He/she must be a natural-born citizen of the Unites States
- He/she must be at least 35 years old
- He/she must be a resident of the United States for at least 14 years.
Since in option (c) the former Secretary was born in Yugoslavia, he/she does not satisfy the first criteria. The other two options satisfy all the three criteria.
Answer: C In a 100-meter race, two of Amy's co-participants won Silver and Bronze and she performed exceedingly well; it follows that Amy won Gold.
Explanation:
There is a flaw in the evidence presented by the lawyer, several flaws actually:
- The client could have been the culprit and left the main door and garage open as an alibi.
- There is no mention of there being an altercation with a thief that cost the wife her life.
- There is no mention of things being stolen to prove that it was a thief.
The attorney used one logic and deduced a flawed conclusion from it so the option that is similar has to do the same as the above.
Option A is not applicable here as blame was taken by the perpetrator.
Option B is not flawed as one would be expected to be late in such circumstances.
Option C has a flaw because performing exceedingly well is relative. Amy could simply be performing exceedingly well in relation to past races. Amy's co-participants could have performed even better which is why they won medals and while Amy performed exceedingly well by her standards, it was not enough to win a medal.
Option D has no flaw. It is a logical deduction and argument just like option E.