Well, this had<span> made people think that their religious beliefs had been more important than the political needs of the Union. This is actually still seen today because some of the political leaders like the president will bring religion into politics and it then creates conflicts as there are a huge number of accepted religions in the United States.
I hope this helps!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Please mark me as Brainiest</span>
They do it because it helps restore spirituality vitality of Iroquois nations. it was fought for vengeance
Answer:
Chronologicznie dane wydarzenia miały miejsce odpowiednio w latach 1000, 1025 i 1109.
- <u><em>Konwencja gnieźnieńska odbyła się w 1000 roku. Było to spotkanie księcia Bolesława z cesarzem Otto III.
</em></u>
<u><em>
</em></u>
- <u><em>Później koronacja królewska księcia Bolesława odbywa się po śmierci Henryka II w 1024 roku. Przerwa w Niemczech spowodowała spustoszenie. Stąd Bolesław, widząc w tym swoją przewagę, koronował się na króla. Miejsce i data tej koronacji są nadal nieznane.
</em></u>
<u><em>
</em></u>
- <u><em>Wojna polsko-niemiecka miała miejsce 24 sierpnia 1109 r. W Śląskim Mieście.</em></u>
Answer: the representation of states in Congress.
<em>The Great Compromise and the Three-Fifths Compromise both focused on </em><em>the representation of states in Congress.</em>
Both of these compromises were devised during the United States Constitutional Convention in 1787. The Great Compromise resolved a dispute between small population states and large population states. The large population states wanted representation in Congress to be based on a state's population size. The smaller states feared this would lead to unchecked dominance by the big states; they wanted all states to receive the same amount of representation. The Great Compromise created a bicameral (two-chamber) legislature. Representation in the House of Representatives would be based on population. In the Senate, all states would have the same amount of representation, by two Senators.
The Three-Fifths Compromise was a way of accounting (somewhat) for the population of slaves in states that permitted slavery. For taxation and representation purposes, the question was whether slaves should count in the population figures. (They were not considered voting citizens at that time.) The Three-Fifths Compromise said that three out of every five slaves could be counted when determining a state's population size for determining how many seats that state would receive in the House of Representatives.
