I support Andrew Jackson's claim which states that the Indian Removal was done in the best interests of American Indians.
The indian removal of the United States to Individual States brough several benefits, such as:
- It put an end to a possible <u>danger of collision.</u>
- It <u>allowed states to grow</u> rapidly in wealth, power and population, which reinforced the southwestern border.
In addition, the indian removal to the native americans contributed to:
- <u>Release the Indians</u> of the power of the state.
- Enabled them to <u>maintain their way of life</u> (culture, traditions, language, etc).
As Jackson quoted himself "The removal was necessary because the <u>Native Americans would be annihilated</u>".
Answer:
The rights of Vietnam and its people must be respected.
Explanation:
I did the question and got it right. This is the answer.
Martin Luther of Germany set forth reforms for the Catholic Church atthe Council.
The Council of Trent was<span> held between 1545 and 1563 in </span>Trent <span>and Bologna, northern Italy.
It was one of the Roman Catholic Church's most important ecumenical </span>councils<span>. It was Prompted by the Protestant Reformation and also it has been declared as the visible form of the Counter Reformation.</span>
Answer:
The Constitution was different from the Articles of Confederation in many ways. The Constitution gave our federal government more power, so it could sufficiently run. Under the Articles of Confederation our government was uni-cameral; the Constitution changed it to bi-cameral (House of Representatives and Senate). The US Constitution also created a court system which was previously not existing in the Articles of Confederation. Our constitution has enable to protect the rights of the citizens.
Explanation:
Answer:
They paid great deals of money- The process of all of that was called "mummification."