A person can think however they want. Actions, like many have said, define a person in the end. Someone can advocate for peace with malicious intent, but they will still likely be remembered for advocating peace and not for their impure motivations. If these contradicting images are revealed to the public, that is still an act against that person, and is no longer a thought.
However, this is only from the public's view. When it comes to people, they may as well be the embodiment of their thoughts. Everything is fueled by something. The same person who seeds their own goals under the guise of peace will not think of themselves as one who acts with the intentions of bringing peace. They will be looking to call forth whatever it is that they want, and be aware that what they present to the public is not the truth.
So, both points are arguable. It depends on whether you value the individual or the community. Actions are what are remembered, and thoughts are a person's reason. Even today, this comes into relevancy because people want to know why certain figures in history did what they did. Thoughts make a person human, after all. Without thought, seperation of man and beast would be nigh impossible. Without action, man would have been left behind long ago. Both thought and action are important indeed.
It's either
Satan has tempted Eve into eating the apple from the tree of knowledge.
<span>or
Satan and the fallen angels have been expelled from Heaven.
but in my opinion - it's most likely the last one.</span>
I would say the author means that it would be impossible, or would require tech that today's tech cannot do.
science fiction, or fiction, usually means make believe or fake.
1. <span>the men in Span One felt no guilt
In </span><span>"The Prisoner Who Wore Glasses" , the men in Span one were the people that are arrested due to politic-related scandals.
These men came in believing that they haven't done any bad things and society also do not treat them as outcasts.
2. </span> Brille thinks of Hannetjie as a child.
In "The Prisoner Who Wore Glasses" . In the story <span>Hannetjie is depicted as someone who constantly display oppressive behaviors toward Brille without any particular reason (like what a child usually does)
3. The answer is </span><span>kind but mischievous
</span>In the story, there are several occurences where Brill made efforts to take care of other members of his group.
But he also proved to be miscievous because he is willing to blackail Hannetjie in order to strike favorable deal for him.
Tom Walker would not give the devil the gold
