a) Proof by contradiction is different from traditional proof as it accepts a single example showing that a statement is false, instead of having the need to derive a general relationship for all input values.
b) The statement is true by contradiction as the sum of the measures is of 160º, and not 180º.
<h3>What are supplementary angles?</h3>
Two angles are called supplementary angles if the sum of their measures has a value of 180º.
The measures of the angles in this problem are given as follows:
Then the sum of the measures of this angles is given as follows:
90 + 70 = 160º.
Which is a different sum of 160º, confirming the statement that the angles are not supplementary by contradiction.
A similar problem, involving proof by contradiction and supplementary angles, is presented at brainly.com/question/28889480
#SPJ1
<u>burned: </u>756 calories
<u>hours:</u> 3
same number of calories each hour
-> to find this, we must split the number of calories evenly among the hours
<u>steps</u>
756/3
= 252 calories per hour
Answer:
1/30 of a scale.
Step-by-step explanation:
Multiply the 20 by 12 to convert it to inches. Then divide the answer by 8 to get the scale.
4/3 • 5/3 = 20/9 divided by 2 = 10/9
Answer:Alto 16cm Ancho 32cm
A+2A=48
3A=48
/3
A=16
Step-by-step explanation:
