Answer: 1) a member of the jury supposes that all of the relevant evidence has been presented because the closing statements begin tomorrow
5) a reader considers some of the circumstantial evidence in the text and concludes that a specific character committed the crime
Explanation: they are inferring or assuming something based on already known variables
ANSWER: <span>B) This latest attack is yet another in a long line of lies from the lunatics in the opposing party.
EXPLANATION:
-Inflammatory Language contains statements which cause anger, excitement, or unnecessary wording that might trigger a person or certain group of people.
-All the other choices keep their statements ranging from neutral to somewhat irritating, but Answer B) is savage (calling the opposing party lunatics, dang...)
Hope this Helps!</span>
It’s a a summon for peace and rational thinking
Answer:
We don't know the answer to question 3
I believe it would be person vs. person because she’ll probably have a conflict with her mother for not letting her go..?
