The appropriate conclusion of the hypothesis is; The researcher has statistical evidence to conclude that the population mean shower length for high school students is greater than 10 minutes.
<h3>What is the conclusion of the hypothesis?</h3>
We are given;
Sample size; n = 125
Population mean; μ = 10 minutes
Sample Mean; x' = 14.7 minutes
Now, we are told that the hypothesis was carried out and the p-value was 0. Now, the significance level is α = 0. 05 and this means that the p-value is less than the significance level.
In conclusion, we will reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the population mean shower length for high school students is greater than 10 minutes.
Read more about Hypothesis Conclusion at; brainly.com/question/15980493
All of the aforementioned factors are possible causes for a mood disorder except: D. religious factors.
<h3>What is mood disorder?</h3>
Mood disorder simply refers to a type of psychological disorder in which a person has an unbalanced and improper emotions, and it's typically characterized by long periods of extreme sadness or extreme happiness.
Some of the factors that are possible causes for a mood disorder include the following:
In conclusion, all of the aforementioned factors are possible causes for a mood disorder except religious factors.
Read more on mood disorder here: brainly.com/question/25764595
#SPJ1
The testimony regarding the man’s conduct during the three prior arrests is:
- The reason for this is that the prior events serve as impermissible character evidence.
<h3>What is irrelevant evidence?</h3>
Irrelevant evidence is the type of evidence that does not apply to the issue at hand and can cause a distortion of the facts.
In the case of the police officer in question, the evidence that he wants to present will cause confusion about the issues and possibly mislead the jury.
Learn more about irrelevant evidence here:
brainly.com/question/1865742
#SPJ1
Complete question:
A man has sued a police officer, alleging that the officer violated the man's civil rights by using excessive force while arresting him. At trial, the officer admits to having hit the man in the head with the butt of his gun but contends that the force was necessary because the man was resisting arrest. In support of his contention, the officer seeks to introduce evidence that the man had resisted arrest on three prior occasions during the last 10 years.
Is this testimony regarding the man’s conduct during the three prior arrests admissible?
Answer:
Listen to a mental health professional who can guide him through his troubles.
Taking medication without a doctors prescription isn’t really a healthy action
