I think this is the correct one, Once upon a midnight dreary, while I pondered weak and weary,
<span>Over many a quaint and curious volume of forgotten lore—</span>
Old people that are rich didn't die,they just goes bankrupt
Ani analyses how "DeLuca's haphazard patchwork of reasoning and evidence leaves the reader wondering whether he believes his own claim". According to Ani he quotes not only supporters of the Nobel price committee but also detractors. He includes a sampling of Dylan's lyrics and leaves them to speak for themselves.
The evidence (quotes) from the article that best supports Ani's evaluation are:
1. "And it’s a good thing [his lyrics] have been published, because if you’ve gone to see the famously sneering and syllable-garbling Dylan play live in recent years, you probably couldn’t understand a word he was singing."
We could interpret this quote as contradictory, it is not necessarily for or against Dylan's Nobel Price. You could say he is confusing his readers, he seems to be against the sung lyrics and for the published ones.
2. "On one end of Dylan's songwriting spectrum is the vengeful, resolute, and timeless 'Masters Of War' . . . . It’s high dudgeon at its finest: ‘Let me ask you one question: Is your money that good? / Will it buy you forgiveness? Do you think that it could?"
Ani also says that he does a sampling of the lyrics and allows them to speak for themselves. This excerpt shows part of a lyric from the song "Masters of War". He is not necessarily saying its a "good" or "bad" lyric, he describes it as: "vengeful, resolute, and timeless" the reader must decide about its quality or if it is the kind of work that deserves a Nobel Price.
Answer:
The author's viewpoint on "side-stepping student debts is that he thinks its a good idea, and can save you from debt and help you save money. The writer uses rhetoric advance his viewpoint, and make it sound more interesting. He does this by informing and persuading the audiences in a specific situation. The author uses this in his writing, to exaggerate his point.
The author uses rhetoric in his writing. An example of this is when he states "Instead, these smart students sidestep serious college debt before college even begins. " The author uses this to persuade the reader that sidestepping is something smart people do, and can keep you out of debt. This creates an emotional response.
3) Writers use a number of literary devices to persuade a reader to think or follow the authors opinion. They also use it to add strength to an argument. The author uses false statements when he says "Finding entry-level corporate jobs is difficult for young graduates without career experience." This is a false statement because finding a job as a young graduate isn't hard. In fact, lots of places would higher someone who graduated from college. This is because you've graduated from college and are ready to apply what youve learned in school to real life.
Writers use fallacious sometimes in their writing. Fallacious is based on a mistaken belief. Other words invalid and faulty reasoning. As the writer writes about sidestepping, he uses a lot of it to make his opinion sound more persuading. In writing fallacious can make you sound persuading or smart, but isn't helpful because it's not true.
Explanation:
Feel free to copy and paste
Thomas Hobbes came up with the idea of the social contract in 1657. His ideas were influenced by the English Civil War. He argued the importance of government, saying that society would be in ruins without it. Because of his pessimistic view of people, believing we are all born naturally evil and corrupt, he believed that absolute rule was the only answer. He wanted to form a social contract with the government primarily because he wanted to ensure self-interest. John Locke built off of Hobbes ideas but changed them to fit his own ideals. He wanted the power of government to come from the people's consent, keeping the rulers accountable to their people, yet in power.
Hope that helps!
