Answer:
B
Explanation:
It goes over the important parts of the paragraph above.
Answer:
If your options are:
A. The poem uses variations of meter to affect rhyme.
B. The poem’s sentences flow across stanzas.
C. The poem’s stanzas have varying lengths.
D. The poem uses nontraditional syntax and rhyme scheme.
Then the answer is D.
Explanation:
The nontraditional syntax is best shown in the use of enjambment - interrupting the thought and syntactic structure in the middle and moving the rest to the next line. For example: "and older than the // flow of human blood (...)"
Here, the definite article "the" has been separated from the noun "flow", which means the phrase is visually broken in half.
- A isn't true because this poem conveys its meaning through rhythm and not rhyme. There are virtually no rhymes here and the syntax (sentence structure) is disrupted, invoking the sound of a river flowing in irregular but consistent waves.
- B isn't true because the sentences do flow across lines but not across stanzas.
- The stanzas do have varying lengths. But even though this element was pretty rare prior to the 20th century, it is not exclusive to modernist poetry. That's why C isn't true either.
The sentence would be a compound sentence, I believe.
The correct answer of the given question above would be the first statement. According to the riddle of the rosetta stone, the detail that helped scholars determine that the second Egyptian inscription was a simpler form of Egyptian writing that had been created by “the people” is that, the scholars had seen examples of it before written on rolls of papyrus, a writing material used by the Egyptians.
Answer: A monolougue
Explanation: A chorus is like a song, a dialogue is talking to someone, a monologue is just talking to an audience which mercutio is doing
