With the case study given above, it may be ascertained that,
- The want to avoid 'The CSI Effect' is a non-discriminatory reason to eliminate the jurors in general, as it does not conflict to any social discrimination based upon gender, race or other such factors;
- Furthermore, it is to be assumed that 'The CSI Effect' is directly tied to age as per the beliefs of Angela, and involves social discrimination based on the age of jurors.
<h3>What is social discrimination?</h3>
Any discriminative act, which directly relates to a biased behavior based upon the factors such as age, race, gender, ethnicity, and other such factors contained under Constitution lead to social discrimination.
As per the beliefs of Angela, her act of wanting to avoid 'The CSI Effect' conflicts a social discrimination for young jurors only, and not in general, as it is a discrimination of age.
Hence, the significance of social discrimination is aforementioned.
Learn more about social discrimination here:
brainly.com/question/13964317
#SPJ1
Yes because it states that you can’t do that because you can get hurt
Correct Answers: - Right to Assemble, Freedom of Press, Freedom of Religion
---------------------------
NOT CORRECT: Right to Legal Search & Seizure is apart of the 4th Amend. of the US Const., and Right to maintain / Militia is apart of the 2nd Amend. of the US Const.
Answer:
Yes, it can be heard in a federal court.
Explanation:
A court is a place in which people are charged and determined if they are guilty or innocent the court is also a place to settle dispute or disagreement between two or more parties(a place to settle criminal and civil legal cases).
There are legal cases that only should be heard at a state level or state courts and some that are needed to be heard at the federal court. This depend on several factors or reasons to be heard whether in state courts or at the federal courts.
The cases in the question can be heard in the federal court since the law concerning pollution has jurisdiction over federal Court.
