It seems like the answer is B. throughout the story, we can see that Amak is very passionate about getting food for his family to eat. A seems unlikely as even though the end of the story shows references to him crying, it doesn’t contribute to the main idea of the story. C and D seem unlikely for the same reason.
i hope i was able to help!
Answer:
The line which indicates that good times do not last forever is:
Nothing gold can stay
Explanation:
Robert Frost in his poem "Nothing Gold Can Stay" talks about the inevitability of the things. He illustrates this by using the example of the crops which grow, ripe and then are cut down. Life is just the same as the crops which have to end someday or another. He adds that even the good and beautiful thing will see their end someday.
The ironic elements that is used to show the relationship between this husband and wife is exaggeration.
<h3>How irony is used in the story</h3>
Van Winkle is said to be a good natured and pleasant person but he is still described as henpecked.
His wife is said to be constantly nagging him and asking him to do household chores yet he is said to be a lazy person.
She is said to be eloquent yet the story tells us of her nagging which is not valuable.
Read more on Rip Van Winkle here: brainly.com/question/14389121
#SPJ1
Answer:
Explanation:
"A Jury of Her Peers'' was written by Susan Glaspell. She employs a narrative tone to describe the story. The resolution forms part of the story and it's where the story ends. It is at this point that conflicts are resolved and the story comes to an end. The plot was considered as a feminist literature because two female characters were trying to come up with a solution to a mystery. Mrs Hale and Mrs Peters came up with the conclusion that Mrs Wright killed her husband, and her actions are justified. The circumstances behind the death of John Wright leaves the townsmen in a state of confusion as to what could have led to his death. Mrs Wright killed her husband because she was physically abused by her. Mrs Hale and Mrs Peters hide the evidence against her because they understand how it feels to be humiliated and oppressed by a man. In the end, Mrs Wright is granted freedom.
