Answer:
a) the currently pressing issues about slavery are not specifically mentioned in the Constitution
Explanation:
The problem with slavery in the US was far more condensed than it was mentioned in the Constitution. When Lincoln became president, he understood the current arguments that happened between the free states of the north and the slave states of the south. These arguments were not going to undermine the Constitution because at that time the Constitution was changing. After the Civil War started, these arguments escalated more to a matter or power and “expansion”. The currently pressing issues about slavery were not specifically mentioned in the Constitution. The Constitution at that time had many changes as the years went by. The constitution at first stated that slaves were not considered people. Later slaves became property and were treated like people. It was not until the end of the Civil War, when all arguments ceased with the creation of the three amendments where it states the abolishment of slavery.
Descartes´ purpose in writing Discourse on Method was to find a clear and distinct form of knowledge devoid of any kind of uncertainty brought about by the senses or by confused and obscure ideas.
The correct answer is <span>Constantinople was sacked by the crusaders.
The original idea was to retake Jerusalem which was under control of Muslims. The idea was to go through Egypt and invade. However, unforeseen circumstances happened and one thing led to another and so it ended with the crusaders sacking Constantinople.</span><span />
Answer: No (explanation below)
Explanation:
Napoleon, under the circumstances of the French Kingdom, would not dare attempt to overthrow the king. He would be met with an enraged nobility, Church, and people. ... Without the French Revolution, Napoleon would have had a completely different life. He would not have become First Consul, and then Emperor of France
Answer:
No, I do not agree with him because not every aggression can be solved with military retaliation, force, or killing in self-defense.
Explanation:
John Locke has a theory of war in which he describes war as being a state of destruction which happens because someone pre-meditated taking another person's life. In his theory, he states that a person may kill another if his life is threatened, in self-defense.
He further argues that war is just and fair because it is a response to aggression and that the aggressor loses his or her rights when he puts people in a state of war and any means can be employed to defeat the enemy because war has no rules.