The answer is that they can disagree. As a skill critical thinking is separate from values. Basic reasoning, comprehended as aptitudes alone separate from values, is frequently used to legitimize bias and personal stake. Moral trustworthiness and capable citizenship, saw simply as "great heartedness", are themselves helpless to control by purposeful publicity. The human personality, whatever its cognizant positive attitude, is liable to effective, self-misleading, oblivious egocentricity of psyche. The scholarly ethics themselves are associated.
Pictographs or some other type of symbolic characters
That means that there is no inequality between the factors (health, income and education) within people in a country.
When that is the case, there is no inequity aversion* and the country will be ranked in a higher position depending on the percentages.
* Inequity aversion occurs when, there is is a difference in a specific index amidst people. When it doesn't occur, people have similar health conditions, similar incomes and education.
Hope it helped,
BioTeacher101
(If you have any questions feel free to ask them in the comments)
Disagree they aren’t weak they are just following the law to have no problems
