Answer: True
=================================================
Explanation:
The first amendment prohibits congress from making any law to prohibit free speech, so that means the federal government isn't allowed to restrict speech. However, there are exceptions such as speech to cause a riot, insurrection, obscenities on public airwaves, etc. all of which are not allowed.
In contrast, a private company like Twitter has the choice whether or not to allow or ban a certain post. The first amendment of the constitution does not apply to companies such as this one. On one hand, you could argue that such restriction is a bad thing because it limits speech; but you could also argue that if the government forced companies like Twitter to do a certain action, then it restricts their freedom.
For privately owned social media companies, their platform is something they solely own 100%, meaning that the government does not own or control what goes on that platform. So this is another viewpoint as to why the first amendment doesn't apply to these companies.
In a slight bit of confusing terminology, a private company can be publicly owned. This means that the government doesn't control the company, but rather it's traded on the stock market. Those who own stock in the company are part owners of it. You would have to use the phrasing "government owned and government run" to indicate that the government has full control of such a platform.
Answer:
Well there are lots of things to the response to this
Explanation:
A procedure of response blocking or flooding, works because the fear-eliciting properties of the CS are extinguished. Learned helplessness is likely to develop if, controllable shocks are preceded by uncontrollable shocks.
___________________________________________________________
More specific
___________________________________________________________
-works because the subject's expectations about the consequences of failing to respond are changed
-should not work
-works because the fear-eliciting properties of the CS are extinguished
-works because flooding produces a drastic stimulus change
Answer:
Benefits of owning a Business
1) She would have the, advantage of not sharing her profit with anyone.
2.) She would be her own boss.
3.) She would gain the sense of achievement business ownership.
4.) She would have a legacy in the business.
5.) She doesn't have to pay any special taxes.
Cost of buying the business
1.) She would have an unlimited liability.
2.) She would have limited financial resources to run the business.
3.) Managing difficulties would arise.
4.) The very high time commitment attached to running a firm.
5.)Very little benefits derived in most cases.
6.) limited growth in most cases.
7.) Most one man business has a limited life span/duration.
I think that it was important for the authors of the Constitution to create the bill of rights because before when the people that moved from England to the U.S. they honestly needed that bill of rights because everyone was used to just submitting to the monarchy either the queen and/or the king. Therefore the bill of rights was made to lay down the guidelines as to what is constitutionally right and what is not.
Hope this helps you with whatever you were trying to figure out.
pls mark as brainlist
Explanation:
the process by which green plants and some other organisms use sunlight to synthesize nutrients from carbon dioxide and water. Photosynthesis in plants generally involves the green pigment chlorophyll and generates oxygen as a by-product.
