1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
photoshop1234 [79]
3 years ago
14

In one or two paragraphs explain the effects of the Mexican-American war. What did the United states gain from the war? What wer

e the negative outcomes
History
1 answer:
slamgirl [31]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Use a paraphraser

Explanation:

The Mexican-American war was a conflict between the United States and Mexico. This war was fought from April 1846 to February 1848. This war was caused by annexation of Texas, Mexico's refusal to meet with President Polk's envoy and boundary dispute. The main effect of this war was that the United States took control of a huge area of land including what became New Mexico and California. The negative outcomes of the war for mainly Mexico include: loss of lives, economic ruin, and huge damage to property.

You might be interested in
Why was Frederick Douglass such an effective leader of the abolitionist movement
Lilit [14]

He became a leader in the abolitionist movement, which sought to end the practice of slavery, before and during the Civil War. After that conflict and the Emancipation Proclamation of 1862, he continued to push for equality and human rights until his death in 1895.
6 0
3 years ago
U.s. president woodrow wilson's fourteen points was a proposal based on what post-war principle?
wlad13 [49]
The fourteen points was a statement of principles for peace that was to be used for peace negotiation in order to end world war I
7 0
3 years ago
What is the significance of the landmark Supreme Court case Plessy v. Ferguson?
Ulleksa [173]

Answer:

Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court that upheld the constitutionality of racial segregation laws for public facilities as long as the segregated facilities were equal in quality – a doctrine that came to be known as "separate but equal".

Explanation:

3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
John Locke thought that people were neither good nor bad innately. How did Hobbes’s views differ from those of Locke’s?
Vladimir [108]

Answer:  A) Hobbes thought  people were innately violent.

<u>Further explanation</u>:

Both English philosophers believed there is a "social contract" -- that governments are formed by the will of the people.  But their theories on why people want to live under governments were very different.

Thomas Hobbes published his political theory in <em>Leviathan </em> in 1651, following the chaos and destruction of the English Civil War.  He saw human beings as naturally suspicious of one another, in competition with each other, and violent toward one another as a result.  Forming a government meant giving up personal liberty, but gaining security against what would otherwise be a situation of every person at war with every other person.

John Locke published his <em>Two Treatises on Civil Government </em>in 1690, following the mostly peaceful transition of government power that was the Glorious Revolution in England.  Locke believed people are born as blank slates--with no preexisting knowledge or moral leanings.  Experience then guides them to the knowledge and the best form of life, and they choose to form governments to make life and society better.

In teaching the difference between Hobbes and Locke, I've often put it this way.  If society were playground basketball, Hobbes believed you must have a referee who sets and enforces rules, or else the players will eventually get into heated arguments and bloody fights with one another, because people get nasty in competition that way.   Locke believed you could have an enjoyable game of playground basketball without a referee, but a referee makes the game better because then any disputes that come up between players have a fair way of being resolved.    Of course, Hobbes and Locke never actually wrote about basketball -- a game not invented until 1891 in America by James Naismith.  But it's just an illustration I've used to try to show the difference of ideas between Hobbes and Locke.   :-)

7 0
3 years ago
What event contributed to the rise of John J. Pershing as a leader of the U.S. Army after the death of Frederick Funston
EastWind [94]

Answer:

What event contributed to the rise of John J. Pershing as a leader of the U.S. Army after the death of Frederick Funston? The United States entered World War Two with the capability of placing every soldier

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did the spread of nationalism affect Jewish people living throughout Europe in the 19th century?  A. It inspired a movement
    11·2 answers
  • How does a written Constitution and the Bill of Rights protect the people from the government?
    9·2 answers
  • What kind of foods did ancient people eat? plants only animals only fish only plants, animals, and fish
    12·2 answers
  • Which of the following statements accurately describes the contribution of Eratosthenes?
    10·2 answers
  • What caused WW1 make a claim on what the most important factor was in the start of the war
    15·1 answer
  • What historical event directly led to the end of available frontier lands for settlement?
    11·1 answer
  • Which ideas did Wilson propose in his Fourteen Points? Check all that apply.
    9·2 answers
  • Reducing waste in a shop doesn't help eliminate safety hazards for employees.<br> true or a false
    13·1 answer
  • Who is chris hansen?
    11·1 answer
  • Who, according, were the Big Three?​
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!