1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
yuradex [85]
3 years ago
11

What evidence could be given to show that the executive branch is more powerful today than originally intended in the constituti

on?
Law
1 answer:
Artist 52 [7]3 years ago
3 0
When the writers of the Constitution were initially deciding what powers and responsibilities the executive branch—headed by the president—would have, they were heavily influenced by their experience with the British government under King George III. Having seen how the king and other European monarchs tended to abuse their powers, the designers of the Constitution wanted to place strict limits on the power that the president would have. At the same time, they wanted to give the president enough power to conduct foreign policy and to run the federal government efficiently without being hampered by the squabbling of legislators from individual states. In other words, the Framers wanted to design an executive office that would provide effective and coherent leadership but that could never become a tyranny.

Read more: Executive Branch - The Executive Branch And The Constitution - President, Power, Powers, and Framers - JRank Articles https://law.jrank.org/pages/6652/Executive-Branch-Executive-Branch-Constitution.html#ixzz6rIgGN7y3
You might be interested in
What is the "employment-at-will" doctrine? What are the exceptions to this doctrine
snow_lady [41]
The three major common law exceptions are public policy, implied contract, and implied covenant of good faith. ... The most widely recognized common law exception to the at-will presumption protects employees against adverse employment actions that violate a public interest.
6 0
3 years ago
Mandatory sentences have become common in the criminal justice system, requiring definitive sentences to be imposed in each rele
Svet_ta [14]

Answer:

Explanation:

Mandatory sentences have a general rule, a judge will decide the punishment once the trial is done.  This law came to stop drug crimes.  

The pros of this law are a way to stop drug distribution and prevent them from committing more drug crimes.  

But at the same time is unjust, and doesn’t allow for the judge to be flexible in the process of sentencing individuals, where in some cases they might be innocent.  

These sentencing laws are starting to fail, some lawmakers, and states begun to have other alternatives such as instead of jail, they are forced into treatment programs.  They are called drug court and they are more cost effective. And prevent once they are out of jail keep committing crimes.  

3 0
3 years ago
Martina is arrested for a crime and refuses to take the witness stand at his or her trial.
Vlad1618 [11]

Answer:

In Griffin v. California, the U.S. Supreme Court rules that the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination not only allows a criminal defendant to refuse to take the witness stand during his trial, but it also bars the prosecutor from urging the jury to interpret that silence as an indication that the defendant has something to hide. The Court reasons that the right against self-incrimination would be meaningless if a defendant’s exercise of the right could be used against him.

Hope this helps

6 0
3 years ago
What is the FBI use your own words!
Umnica [9.8K]

Answer:

Federal Bureau of Investigation.

Explanation:

It's basically just like an independent government system that investigates undercover. I'm not sure if I'm exactly right but hope this helps.

3 0
4 years ago
Russell, 45, has been suffering from a mental impairment for a long time. He signs a contract to sell his villa for $1 million t
solong [7]

Answer:

The answer is "Option c"

Explanation:

In the given question it is already declared, that Russell whose age is 45 and he suffers from the mental diseases, at this, he sign a contract to sell his villa to Andre in $ 1 million, at this, Russell's wife Katie, has the court-appointed guardian and without his permission, Russell can't sell the villa, that's why the only option c is correct.      

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following is deductible as dues, subscriptions, or publications? a. Subscription to the "Journal of Taxation" for a
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following is not a program to help people transition from antipoverty programs
    7·1 answer
  • Which statement accurately summarizes how Americans' civil liberties
    13·2 answers
  • In a criminal case who has the burden of proof.
    13·2 answers
  • When can a credit agency release someone’s credit information in Florida?
    10·2 answers
  • For a former convict, the lifetime effects of incarceration can negatively impact _____.
    9·2 answers
  • What was historically significant about Mosaic Law?
    10·2 answers
  • Which of the following are major areas of interest in cognitive psychology?
    10·2 answers
  • Name some poetic device used in my mother at sixty six by Kamala Das. 1970 ​
    6·1 answer
  • A person charged with a crime has a constitutional right to: A. receive a trial by jury . B. demand a trial in federal court . C
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!