I believe the answer is a conclusion
Answer:
<em>(A.) </em> <u>David Knocked on the door of every house, shed, and chicken coop until he had worn his knuckles to the bone.</u>
Explanation:
<u>A </u><u>hyperbole</u><u> is an exaggerated statement, or clainm that is not meant to be taken literally.</u>
(David wouldnt have actually knocked on every door enough to painfully shed his skin and muscle to the bone lol)
Examples:
<em>Im so hungry i could eat a horse </em>
<em> Im so sleepy I could sleep a year</em>
<em> She cries so much she could cry a River </em>
(The questions are about Kate Chopin's short story "The Story of an Hour")
1. Part A
Answer: D
Explanation: Escaping the pressure of marriage and dependency is the central theme here; we are presented with this revelation somewhat unexpectedly, during the climax of Mrs. Mallard's grief in digesting the new of her husband's death. Although a Feminist element is obviously present, equality of men and women (option A) is not the author's concern here. Option B, while true in itself, misses the central theme completely. Option C goes completely against the message: she would not have needed her husband's death to feel free if that was the case.
2. Part B
Answer: C
Explanation: This is the highest point in the narrative: exploding through the storm of grief over her husband's untimely death comes a burst of imagination about the freedom she would enjoy in the following years.
3. Part A:
Answer: D
Explanation: The parting clouds represent her feeling of being oppressed by the will of her husband for years, leaving only the freedom represented by a boundless blue sky.
4. Part B:
Answer: C
Explanation: In this phrase, we see how the author represents the feeling of freedom as something creeping out of the sky, reaching her through the sensory impressions of the spring.
Answer:
비치이스니가 석 마이 칵, 푸우후루댜녀어누두어엉. 나내지자ㅡ내니지바내애자지ㅏㅇ아닞.ㅣ내ㅣ내지지니내내내지지지지ㅣ딛ㄴ.지지지지ㅐ재ㅐ네ㅐ젲ㅈㄴㄴㅉ.
Explanation: