When Mr. Beuller ignores embarrassing Victor, the boy is somewhat confused by this action. But later, Victor thinks of the teacher as a “good guy”. This action of his tutor boosts him with enormous confidence. The shaky Victor portrayed in the start of the prose fully develops at the end of the story because of the mature behavior of Mr. Beurelle. He is filled with motivational thoughts and optimism which help him get out of the confusion of choosing a new language and doubting his own capability. He also inculcates more confident in speaking with Teressa, at the end.
This proves that if sane behavior and mentality runs through the society, every lazy and unwilling person can be turned up into a workaholic maniac. Everyone requires an individual to guide him/her the path of life, which was very well illustrated through the author’s creation. The thoughtful action by the teacher resulted in Victor choosing three books to learn French that day.
The answer is B since the conclusion is based on the premises.
Money is at the heart of the conflict.
Explanation:
Eliza (the girl) was insisting to pay for her lessons even though Higgins did not demand it. It was due to the hesitation of Higgins to teach her to speak gently. Eliza deciphered this as Higgins reluctance of not working for free since he must have thought that poor flower girl won’t have enough to pay for his speaking course.
To clear the air regarding the same, Eliza kept insisting for following a professional approach where she would pay for her speaking course.
If you want to explain to a foreigner how to learn when to use these words, you can say that the go from more general to more specific (in: more general, at: more specific).
in: for objects inside other objects, or for location in a big context: year, country,
on: on top of other objects, or for location in middle-scale contexts: day, street
at: for location on a very small scale: moment (exact time), at specific address<span />
