Because there are still bad people in the World we live in and some immigrants isn’t bad and the world we live in is bad.
Answer:
I would say the answer is A
Explanation:
I've seen this before its just that this answer is based on my memory not completely factual, also we can't see the paragraph?? which means some might not know how to answer it.
Which statement best summarizes Zimbardo’s perspective on the average person’s ability for evil?
A. People will continue to do bad things if they know they can blame it on their social surroundings.
B. A person's capacity for good or evil can change based on their social environment.
C. Social experiments are necessary to determine humanity’s capacity for evil.
D. Evil actions are justified if a person is in a challenging social situation.
Answer:
B. A person's capacity for good or evil can change based on their social environment.
Explanation:
According to the Stanford prison experiment done by Philip Zimbardo, some participants were taken to a facility where they had to act as prisoners and guards.
The "prisoners" were humiliated and dehumanized by the "guards", even though the "guards" were reluctant at first, but as they began to maltreat the "prisoners", they became more comfortable with their acts and began to do more and more.
The experiment shows that a person's ability for evil is based on how their social environment is.
Answer:
The correct answer is "Literary art of diminishing a subject by making it ridiculous and evoking toward it attitudes of amusement, contempt, scorn or indignation".
Explanation:
With this definition, an author can criticize or pinpoint someone's actions or customs with moralizing or burlesque intentions.
A good example of a famous satire would be "A Brave New World" by Aldous Huxley, because it describes a "perfect" civilizacion based on whatever horrors the science would be able to achieve if it were not restrained by human morals.
Hope this helps!
