1. 5N
2. Yes
3. Towards boy A (the one pulling with 10 N)
Answer:
Read Below
Explanation:
Question: The U.S Constitution required that the treaty be ratified by the U.S Senate under the Cherokee Constitution treaties had to be approved by the Cherokee national council. Did this occur with the treaty of 1835?
Answer: Negotiated in 1835 by a minority party of Cherokees, challenged by the majority of the Cherokee people and their elected government, the Treaty of New Echota was used by the United States to justify the forced removal of the Cherokees from their homelands along what became known as the Trail of Tears. In 1819 the remaining Cherokees who opposed removal negotiated still another treaty. So, yes it did occur in 1835.
Do you think U.S government has the right to enforce this treaty?
Another 130 years would pass before another president of the United States personally delivered a treaty to the Senate. On July 10, 1919, President Woodrow Wilson asked for a quick consent to the Treaty of Versailles. The Senate approved the treaty for ratification on October 20, 1803.
Hopes this Helps :D
Mark me as Brainiest Please : )
Answer:
The people grant power to a government for the well-being of all
Explanation:
This theory is one of the speculations that originated. It has been raised since the time of the critics of Greece, yet it has got acknowledgment in the hands of the incredible trio. The name of these extraordinary savants was – John Locke, Thomas Hobbes, and Jean Jacques Rousseau.
It expresses that the conditions in the condition of nature sooner or it became terrible, and to happen to this circumstance, the individuals entered themselves into an agreement, and as indicated by this agreement, the individuals will give up some piece of their entitlement to the sovereign.
According to studies conducted in 2005 and 2010, approximately 65 percent of adults in the United States reported experiencing obsessions or compulsions at some point in their lives, but only 4 percent of them went on to be diagnosed obsessive-compulsive disorder.
Answer:
It is not reasonable to say there is a correlation because it is categorical data. However if it was quantitative data, correlation doesn’t always mean causation, because there might be athird variable (lurking variable) that may have a better explanation for the correlation.
Explanation:
Is it not reasonable to say that there's a correlation between the type of car you own and the risk that it will be stolen because it is categorical data. However if it was quantitative data, correlation doesn’t always mean causation, because there might be a third variable that may have a better explanation for the correlation and it might as well means that the third-lurking variable affects the correlation; for example, those cars that are most frequently reported stolen may simply be the cars that are more commonly sold because they are cheaper than the cars that are stolen least often, and thus have a higher chance of being exposed to thieves.
