Basically its saying photography has become a bit too focused on the past - even if it’s the immediate past. Just take all that talk about, let’s say, how colour photography became an accepted part of art photography (you could also pick the New Topographics<span> or whatever else). And then re-read the quotes…
or saying </span> <span>Fitting in is a necessary, but not sufficient criterion.
Being new is not sufficient.
Popularity right now is not enough.
Someone liking the poem now is not enough.
Does a poem conform to the new times?
Is a poem individual and different?
These are coexisting requirements for a poem to be valuable.
>is a work of art that conforms completely really a work of art?
"Conforming", in the sense of forming the leadership for a new age.
Yes, conforming is a necessary, but not sufficient requirement for a poem:
"its fitting in is a test of its value–a test,"
>should contemporary works of art be judged as “better” or “worse” than past ones?
There is no way that new poems be as bad as old poems, or their canons.
"certainly not judged by the canons of dead critics."</span>
Answer:
Explanation:
So I don't really know what you need help on, if it's correcting the sentence I can help.
1. I wish I HAD today off.
2. If only I Knew the answer.
3. He wishes he VISITED them, but he can't.
4. She wishes she CLEANED.
5. If only he (had?) not EATEN so much garlic.
6. HAD.
D>
2.want my brothers to stop fighting
3.mother to make me eat vegetables
4.sister to wear my clothes.
basically after every sentence ends it's a new wish.
I think you got it from here.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
It says a "narrative essay" and A makes the most sense. You aren't analyzing, you're not telling a story going place to place. It says "exciting journey" and you don't need to argue about anything.
Answer: tax paying citizens, 150,000 firefighters and a billion dollars, logic
Explanation:
on edge
