New Zealand and Australia as colonies were differnet from India because they C. attracted large numbers of settlers from Great Britain.
<h3>How were New Zealand and Austrailia different from India?</h3>
New Zealand and Austrialia were able to attract a lot of British people to stay in them which made them more loyal to the British.
India on the other hand, only provided resources to the British and never really saw a mass migration by British people.
Find out more on the Austrialia colony at brainly.com/question/4196080.
#SPJ1
It is considered anarchy. Because it means a state of no law which allows people to do whatever they want. The government tries to prevent this from happening but it occurs in some small areas. A slight example would be in Ferguson, Missouri in the U.S in which rioters burned buildings and looted stores. That is a form of anarchy, especially if police are not in those areas at the time.
Answer:
c
Explanation:
I took test earlier today
Apartheid left a huge cultural difference among the Africans. Despite being united, they were culturally aprt. This led to various civil wars.
There were various effects of the Civil War but one thing that was not an effect was Reduced rate of industrial production in the north.
<h3>How did the Civil War benefit the North?</h3>
The North benefitted from the Civil War because the Civil War was rarely fought on Northern soil which meant that their industries were not destroyed or damaged by war.
In fact, the North was able to increase industrial production to be able to provide their soldiers with more weapons and provisions to fight the war, thereby increasing industrial production.
Options for this question include:
- Reduced rate of industrial production in the north
- Increased rate of industrial production in the north
- Massive destruction of Southern infrastructure
Find out more on the effects of the Civil War at brainly.com/question/11470945
#SPJ1
