1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sergejj [24]
2 years ago
6

Quick I need Help!!!!! Quickly!! 30 POINTS if you answer correctly!

History
1 answer:
Andrew [12]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

this statement is Definitely a true answer                                     ``

You might be interested in
How did involvement with Europeans in this region change how Americans Indians there lived
zhannawk [14.2K]
<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same region that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be that the encroachment of Europeans forced many native tribes that had up until this point been rivals to form alliances in order to stop the spread of European settlement. </span></span>
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
GUYS !!!! Help help !!!
Flura [38]
The answer is A because it states differ which means contrast.
3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What decision did the Supreme Court reach in Dred Scott v. Sandford?
loris [4]

Answer:

There have been many decisions in the history of the US Supreme Court that are hard to call democratic. In the British North American colonies, and then in the USA, the legal foundations of the institution of slavery were created. The English legal system ruled out slavery, but gradually in the local laws of the colonies, and later in the Constitution of the United States and in the case-law of the Supreme Court of the United States, the grounds were formulated on which slaves were considered not to be human subjects, but property. This practice has led to the fact that, shortly before the Civil War, a racist attitude was legalized not only towards slaves, but also to the entire black population of the United States, as is clearly seen in the case of Dread Scott v. Sandford.

Dread Scott was a slave whose owner John Emerson took him from Missouri, the state where slavery was allowed, to Illinois, where slavery was prohibited. A few years later, Scott returned to Missouri with Emerson. Scott believed that since he lived in a free state, he should no longer be considered a slave.

Emerson died in 1843, and three years later, Scott sued Emerson's widow, demanding his freedom. In 1850, he won the case in one of the Missouri courts, but in 1852, the state supreme court overturned the lower court. Meanwhile, Ms. Emerson remarried, and Scott became the legal property of her brother John Sanford. Scott sued Sanford to regain his freedom. The case was investigated in one of the federal courts, which in 1854 ruled against Sanford.

When this case was referred to the Supreme Court, its members decided that Scott did not become free by virtue of his living in a free state and that, being a black man, he is not a citizen and, therefore, has no right to file a lawsuit with a court in force according to the norms of general and statutory law. This decision was widely criticized and contributed to the election of Abraham Lincoln as president.

The judgment in the Dred Scott v. Sandford case was declared unconstitutional by the thirteenth constitutional amendment, which abolished slavery in 1865, and the fourteenth amendment, which granted citizenship to former slaves in 1868.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What were the major failings of the Dawes Act? (Site 1)
satela [25.4K]

Answer:

Historian Eric Foner believed "the policy proved to be a disaster, leading to the loss of much tribal land and the erosion of Indian cultural traditions." The law often placed Indians on desert land unsuitable for agriculture, and it also failed to account for Indians who could not afford the cost of farming. In addition to scant payment, Native Americans were not used to spending money and quickly spent most of what they received. Many were left with little land and little money. Inheritance also became an issue for many Native Americans who enrolled to receive land from the Dawes Act. The assimilation policy of the Dawes Act failed because it didn't take into account the social and cultural differences between the Native Americans and the white settlers. Many others like the Kiowas didn't want to assimilate into white culture and as such resisted.

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Why was the Mexican government worried about the number of Americans moving into the region?
UkoKoshka [18]

Answer:

B

Explanation:

Took the test

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Lenin and Hitler both (5 points)
    11·1 answer
  • The Dutch East India Company made quite a profit in the New World--for a while. However, it was never able to increase its earni
    8·1 answer
  • What 16th century European humanist wrote the famous book Utopia
    5·2 answers
  • Which of the following conditions are NOT applicable to the Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium?
    13·2 answers
  • All these led to or increased tension in Massachusetts EXCEPT
    7·1 answer
  • What is the purpose of the consumer price index?
    10·1 answer
  • During reconstruction congress passed the fourteenth and fifteenth amendments
    6·1 answer
  • Which can be inferred from the graph?
    9·1 answer
  • Someone help me with my questions on my page
    12·1 answer
  • Fill in the chart describing Jefferson’s actions during his presidency
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!