The piece of evidence that explains economic turmoil would be B. However, financial experts said that turbulent international politics "could cause increases in global energy prices or exacerbate global supply shortages."
<h3>How wo
uld the Ukraine conflict affect the economy?</h3>
Russia is one of the world's largest suppliers of oil and natural gas and they sell these to Europe and United States.
With the Ukraine conflict disrupting the supply of these to the United States, global energy prices will rise because there will be shortages from Russia.
In conclusion, option B is correct.
Find out more on Russia's exports at brainly.com/question/1212598.
Answer:The department of justice
Explanation:Because the constitution makes it clear that the supreme court
Can you roll only one real caseBut cannot issue advisory opinions
The best answer is B.
The Warsaw pact is the name commonly given to the treaty between Albania, Bulgaria, Czechoslovakia, East Germany, Hungary, Poland, Romania and the Soviet Union which was signed in Poland in 1955 and was officially called The Treaty of friendship, Co-operation and Mutual Assistance. It was called the Warsaw pact because it was signed in Warsaw.
It was a response to the formation (by western allies) of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). West Germany was allowed to join NATO and was allowed to re- militarize and thus the Soviets saw this as a potential threat.
1. To end a the war in short time.
2. The japan were already weak but were probably gonna draw out the war
3. honestly i cant think of anything outs
The Founding Fathers, among them, George Washington, were profoundly influenced by the historical example set by the Roman Republic: they were absolutely weary of any man, though popular, competent, charismatic might be, feeling tempted to overstretch the boundaries of the power bestowed upon him by the will of the people, i.e., they were aware that a president might well feel tempted to seize absolute power and become either a dictator or a monarch. Thus, George Washington felt that staying in office for too long would cloud his judgment as appointed government official and might feel tempted to abuse his power, so he chose to step down from a third term as president to both avoid criticism pointing to his intentions to institute a dictatorship or monarchy and the potentiality of making mistakes that might harm the American Republic.
