The statement about contractions that is true is <u>You should usually omit contractions from academic writing.</u>
<u />
A contraction is the use of symbols or words to shorten a sentence or phrase, which makes it informal.
For example, when the phrase: "You are eating Oreos" is used and a person wants to shorten it using contraction, then he would exchange the "a" with an apostrophe which shortens it and gives you: "<u>You're eating Oreos"</u>
Therefore, the statement about contractions which is true is:
<u>A. You should usually omit contractions from academic writing.</u>
Read more here:
brainly.com/question/12463704
The correct option is option D ("Read the results section before you read the discussion section").
Taking a look at the results before you read the discussion section will allow you to form your own interpretation after analysing the content of the article <u>without being biased by what the author's conclusion was in light of the results</u>.
Here's my interpretatin of why the other options are wrong:
A) You should always start with the introduction and never with the abstract. <u>If you first read the abstract, you run the risk of becoming biased towards the author's perspective from the get go</u>.
B) & C) The discussion and conclusion sections should always be the last thing you read. <u>You need to understand the whole article by yourself and generate your own interpretation to be able to contrast it with the author's conclusion and other points of view expressed in the discussion</u>.
Hope this helps!
This sentence is an example of this primary English sentence pattern:
D. Subject (the toddler) + action verb (tossed) + indirect object (his father) + direct object (the ball).
Answer:
Who
Explanation:
You use whom whenever you talk about the object of a verb. But you use who to refer to the subject of the sentence.
This helps:
Whom can be replaced by him or her
Who can be replaced by he or she
Wow, I need to have more cents with my money.
I Knead you to please hand me that bread.
