The United States. Just got this question on APEX
The u.s. was fighting in Vietnam but they were also facing huge protest back on the continental u.s. about the Vietnam war, among other things
A debate from the perspective of a Northerner over Missouri Statehood would be one talking about the importance of limiting slavery.
A argument from a Southerner would be one arguing that Northerners should allow slavery in states that want slavery.
<h3>What were the arguments for Missouri Statehood?</h3>
Missouri wanted to gain admission into the Union as a slave state and the North did not want this because they were against slavery spreading to other parts of the Union.
Southerners on the other hand, wanted slavery in Missouri as they believed that it would increase the power of slave states in Congress. They therefore argued that territories such as Missouri that wanted slavery, should be free to have slavery.
Find out more on Missouri Statehood at brainly.com/question/1855671.
Burgoyne's surrender followed battles with American General Horatio Gates near Saratoga in September and October 1777. With the British losing men and defenses during both engagements, Burgoyne retreated with a weakened army to Saratoga, where he surrendered to General Gates.
:)
<span><span>A.</span>Feudalism</span>
In AD 1066, the Norman invasion of Britain overpowered the
Saxon-Dane rulers. They brought with them the feudal system of government or
feudalism. They establish the King of England. From then, England was changed
for ever. Normans spoke a variant of Frankish language or French and were known
to build castles everywhere, which served as the main form of defense. In the feudal
system of government, commoners worked and fought for nobles in exchange for
protection and the use of land.
