Answer:This reading is designed to develop the analytical skills you need for a more ... But if you look at the manuscript stanza 5, you can see revisions from “What” to ... On a daily basis, we probably read much less poetry than we do prose. ... this time asking yourself if the speaking voice changes in the last two stanzas
Explanation:
Answer and Explanation:
Henry's speech at the Virginia Convention is titled "Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death" where he expresses all the anger he feels towards England's domination of American territory. In this speech, he presents a persuasive tone, where he encourages the listeners to agree with his arguments and also to revolt against the English dominance. To achieve this he uses the rhetorical device called "pathos" which is the device that evokes the sentimentality of people and uses the emotions of the public to persuade them. In Henry's speech, this rhetorical feature can be observed in several sentences, especially in sentences such as:
- " What terms shall we find which have not been already exhausted? Let us not, I beseech you, sir, deceive ourselves. Sir, we have done everything that could be done to avert the storm which is now coming on. We have petitioned; we have remonstrated; we have supplicated; we have prostrated ourselves before the throne, and have implored its interposition to arrest the tyrannical hands of the ministry and Parliament."
- "Why stand we here idle? What is it that gentlemen wish? What would they have?"
- "Sir, we are not weak if we make a proper use of those means which the God of nature hath placed in our power. The millions of people, armed in the holy cause of liberty, and in such a country as that which we possess, are invincible by any force which our enemy can send against us. Besides, sir, we shall not fight our battles alone."
Answer:
Inductive, weak
Explanation:
<u>This is an inductive argument because it is using a personal preference</u> to refer to the red wines from Australia, <u>instead of using an unbiased fact</u> like some professional taster's review of the red wines that the argument talks about and is weak because of the poor management of words it uses, it says "all red wines" while it only talks about 3 red wines.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Yes, the Card Criminal Syndicalism Act outlawing the expression of revolutionary political views violate the First Amendment of the Bill of Rights.
Under the Bill of Rights, every United States citizen has the right to freely express with respect, although its opinions criticize the government. Exactly that was the intention of the founding fathers of the United State, that people could have freedom of speech to express their concerns or demand certain changes.
Let's have in mind that during the 1910s and 1920s, different state governments enacted criminal syndicalism laws to prohibit workers support their demands. Many people were arrested during that spam for organizing or participating in protests and demonstrations.
Because Ruth left her home land. Everything she ever knew. She left her God's even. This relates to the believers because God wants us to leave everything we have, to follow him and his good ways. Ruth was a symbol of hope.
