I shall replace the salesman after discovering that a salesman is receiving kickbacks from my largest customer, analog concerns.
Answer: Option A
<u>Explanation:</u>
In the above mentioned scenario, the salesman is given a kickbacks - "advantages" for either the good relationship that they have maintained with the client or for luring them to always provide them the product/service with discounts.
So in this situation I would obviously replace the salesman because such situations cannot be ignored and there is no assurance that the salesman will not take kickbacks henceforth. And asking for a cut is ethically wrong as the salesman getting the kickbacks.
Answer:
It represents the Integration stage
Explanation:
Money laundering is an illegal chain of activities done by individuals or corporate bodies to change the status of money gotten through a criminal activity into legitimate money. This chain of activities starts with the Placement stage then transforms into the Layering stage, then ends when it is already integrated into the legitimate financial system through the Integration stage.
After the money launderer conceals the illegal money through bank deposits or purchasing a life insurance policy at the Placement stage, the launderer then proceeds to further break the money into smaller amounts to evade suspicion by numerous transactions and bank deposits at the Layering stage, which is then ended by partial or whole surrenders of life insurance policies to make it now legitimate money.
Answer:
Both are ongoing
Explanation:
Remember, projects do not go on forever. Rather, projects are usually marked by deadlines. However, operations are simply ongoing activities in which resources are planned, executed, monitored and controlled by individuals.
which may be constrain
A none similarity between projects and operations is that, they both are not ongoing .
Answer:
A Nash equilibrium results when every firm in an industry chooses a strategy that is optimal given the strategies chosen by its competitors.
