The Great Comprimise (also known as the Connecticut Compromise) represented the interests of those who wanted a strong national government and those who wanted states to have a strong voice in the sense that it required all states to be represented equally in the upper house (Senate).
Answer:
Alexander Hamilton proposed that the Federal government assume the war debts of all of the former colonies as a way to increase the credit of the new National government.
Answer:
via wikipedia
Explanation:
The Chicago school is best known for its urban sociology and for the development of the symbolic approach, interactionist notably through the work of Herbert Blumer. It has focused on human behavior as shaped by social structures and physical environmental factors, rather than genetic and personal characteristics. Biologists and anthropologists had accepted the theory of evolution as demonstrating that animals adapt to their environments. As applied to humans who are considered responsible for their own destinies, members of the school believed that the natural environment, which the community inhabits, is a major factor in shaping human behavior, and that the city functions as a microcosm: "In these great cities, where all the passions, all the energies of mankind are released, we are in a position to investigate the process of civilization, as it were, under a microscope.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
They were in a good place for growing plants: near two rivers and also near high mountain valleys—allowed its residents to grow both maize, which thrived in the lowlands of the river valley, and potatoes, which grew best in the higher altitudes of the Andes Mountains.
Explanation:
A social movement is a loosely organized effort by a large group of people to achieve a particular goal, typically a social or political one.[1][2] This may be to carry out, resist or undo a social change. It is a type of group action and may involve individuals, organizations or both. Definitions of the term are slightly varied.[3] Social movements have been described as "organizational structures and strategies that may empower oppressed populations to mount effective challenges and resist the more powerful and advantaged elites".[4] They represent a method of social change from the bottom within nations
