Answer:
terry v. ohio
Explanation:
Terry v. Ohio, in 1968, was a major decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court ruled that the Fourth Amendment's prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures is not in violation when a police officer stops a suspect on the street and frisks him or her without probable cause to arrest, if the police officer has a reasonable suspicion that the person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime and has a reasonable belief that the person "may be armed and presently dangerous."
Answer:
The Corpus Juris Civilis, created by order of Byzantine Emperor Justinian I to compile the laws in force at the time, would become a vital foundation for both the civil law and common law traditions.
Explanation:
Answer:
This question does not make sense. Could you please provide more information, then i will be able to help you with your question. Thanks.
Explanation:
Answer:
A. True
Explanation:
This works for the charities almost all the time because interventions like these appeal to the human side as people are more likely to support causes like these.
Also, if children are sent door-to-door, this will compel people to give as they are less likely to suspect children since they are always potrayed as innocent.
Since these school-age children are usually involved in fund raising programs in their schools, donors are less likely to suspect fraud as fund raising is already popular among them.
Therefore, this makes is easy for phony charities to hide behind an already existing and legit system.
Answer:
Loose constructionism is an ideological position of legal interpretation (especially of the Constitution) by means of which the judges have the power not only to judge compliance with the different laws, but also to interpret the text of the legal provisions of the Constitution, defining its scope and content.
Two arguments in favor of this position are, on the one hand, that the Constitution is not a rigid law but that it is constantly being modified through jurisprudential interpretations, with which it is necessary for judges to be able to interpret its clauses in a lax way; and on the other, that a rigid Constitution would be easily set aside by society, since it would not adapt to changes in circumstances on its part.