The predicate nominative in this sentence is state, because it is showing what Alaska became.
Your answer is a cut-up technique.
Answer:
The second sentence is a run-on sentence
Explanation: A run-on sentence is when two or more independent clauses (phrases that can stand on their own as a sentence) are not connected properly. You can connect them with a comma, or a conjunction(and, so, etc)
The second sentence has two independent clauses, "you must be going somewhere nice" and "your outfit is so elegant". However, these aren't connected properly so the answer is the second choice.
She feels that his wearing of the black veil will likely harm the reputation of the minister.I believe this is the best explanation for her concerns about how people will wonder why he is wearing a black veil and conjecture that he has something to hide and thus cast doubt on his reputation and perhaps jeopardize his career as a minister.
III. hasty generalization
A syllogistic fallacy is more of a generalization than it is a sequence or analogy. This error of reasoning occurs by first mentioning something broad/general then proceeds to make a conclusion about something that is very specific by means of generalizing. For example, this would be considered fallacy of syllogism:
All jets are air crafts. All propeller airplanes are air crafts. Therefore, propeller airplanes are jets.
Thus, you can see how a generalization is made about propeller airplanes being jets because they are both air crafts.
