Los tipos de historias

History

2 answers:

sesenic [268]2 years ago

7 0

Que es la pregunta?????

attashe74 [19]2 years ago

6 0

Que es la pregunta?

You might be interested in

Compare the advantages and disadvantages of stateless societies and those with monarchies or other forms of hereditary rule

postnew [5]

In stateless societies there is little concentration of authority, most positions of authority that exist are very limited in their power and such positions are usually not permanently occupied, and social agencies resolve disputes through Predefined rules tend to be small. Stateless societies are very variable in economic organization, and cultural practices. Most of the history of mankind people have lived in stateless societies. However, few Stateless societies exist at present, since most of them have been obliged to integrate with the state-level companies that surround them.

The Monarchy is a form of State (although it is often defined as a form of Government) in which a group integrated into the State, usually a family that represents a dynasty, embodies the national identity of the country and its head, the monarch, He exercises the role of head of state. The political power of the monarch can vary from the purely symbolic (parliamentary monarchy), to integrate in the form of government: with considerable but restricted executive powers (constitutional monarchy), even the completely autocratic (absolute monarchy).

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

In 1883, several civil rights cases came before the Supreme Court that were related to

OverLord2011 [107]

Answer:

The Civil Rights Cases, 109 U.S. 3 (1883), were a group of five cases in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments did not empower Congress to outlaw racial discrimination by private individuals.

3 0

3 years ago

Were the Alien and Sedition Acts constitutional or unconstitutional? Did they follow the meaning of the Constitution or did they

lidiya [134]

The Alien and Sedition Acts were unconstitutional as it limited free speech, which is guaranteed in the first Amendment. If the individual states chose to nullify the acts, that would be a sign of rebellion. I do not think that the US should institute forms of the Alien and Sedition Act. It's America. The people here should be free to say what they want to say.

5 0

3 years ago

PLEASE HELP ME WITH THIS PAGE I DON'T KNOWWW

agasfer [191]

Is there options for the question, or is this just a generalized question?

8 0

3 years ago

Match the British Act with the colonial reaction.

Lerok [7]

1. Boycott = Townsend Act
2. Smuggling = Sugar and Molasses Act
3. Second Continental Congress = Stamp Act
4. Boston Tea Party = Intolerable Act

Hope this Helped! :)

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers