I think it might be Facilitation. Based on the text you gave, it seems like she first, kept her car running, and also seems like she didn’t lock her car. She basically helped whatever car jacked that was waiting there, steal her car. She didn’t take any steps to help secure her car and prevent a crime like that. She facilitated. I’m not sure if this is right btw just seems to me this answer would make sense.
A. True the parent is responsible for the safety of the child in all cases
Answer:
unethical
1. because everyone should be treated the same as the other.
2. because it is wrong to persuade the prosecutor even if they are friends or not.
3.if the client has done something wrong then he should be treated nicer he should be treated normally as everyone else even if the lawyer is friends with the prosecutor
Explanation:
Answer and Explanation:
1. The court's decision was that the press has the complete right to expose information from any government sector, including information related to the executive sector, even if that information were related and were in the possession of the president of the republic.
2. I agree with the court's decision, since government information must be exposed to the people who are the center of national politics. This prevents important information from being hidden from the public and that possible cases of corruption from proceeding and cannot be judged by popular opinion.
3. This case is important today because it guarantees the rights defended by the first amendment, ensuring that the press cannot be limited by the government and promoting the free exercise of information.
