Answer:
D. Children are in danger because of the road conditions on Green Street.
Explanation:
An inference is a conclusion made based on pieces of evidence and reasoning. When we're reading a text, we can make various inferences based on the details we're offered. Not all information is presented explicitly, which is why this process is very important. That is the only way we will fully understand the text.
Based on the text you were given, we can conclude that children are in danger because of the road conditions on Green Street. We're told about how close to children cars and trucks are and how lucky we are that the number of accidents is relatively low. These are the details that lead us to this conclusion. This is why option D is the correct one.
The rest of the options aren't supported by details offered in the text, which is why they are incorrect.
The answer is D. It suggests the destruction of traditional values and the loss of hope.
Answer:
Bittman’s idea is not new, of course; many experts and policy groups have long recommended soda taxes, for example, or government-issued vouchers for farmers’ market produce, and some municipalities in the U.S. (and some countries outside the U.S.) have toyed with, or in fact implemented, such taxes or similar concepts. But Bittman’s piece is notable for making a persuasive argument for the use of taxes and subsidies to reshape our diet, systematically laying out the benefits and dispatching the arguments of potential detractors, in a widely-read newspaper.
Explanation:
